Canadian startups and scaleups are making decisions about their intellectual property, or IP, from day one, whether they realize it or not. Which parts of the technology should the company try to patent or keep as a trade secret? Who actually owns each piece of the work? The company, an employee, or a contractor? What can be shown at a demo or shared with a customer without giving something away? Most founders don’t recognize these as IP decisions until much later, when the company is raising money, facing competition, licensing its technology, or trying to grow into new markets. By then, some of the choices have already been made by default. 

IP is often treated as legal paperwork, something to sort out before a fundraising round or a big customer conversation. In reality, it is a set of strategic business decisions that shape commercialization strength, investment readiness, and long-term company value. Get them right early, and the company builds on a defensible foundation. Get them wrong or defer them too long, and the cost of correcting course rises with each subsequent stage of growth. 

Deliberately making these decisions is what turns IP into a competitive advantage. 

When founders treat IP as a set of business decisions, it can strengthen how they sell, raise funding, and grow. This is because the technology behind a solution is only one part of what makes it ready for market. How a company protects, owns, and commercializes what it builds matters just as much. The CENGN Living Lab Initiative helps Canadian innovators work through these decisions as part of every project, with IP education and mentorship alongside the technical support and funding already included in the project.  

What IP Decisions Do Canadian Startups and Scaleups Need to Make?  

IP strategy involves more ground than most founders expect. It is not a single decision made once, but a series of choices that come up as a startup or scaleup builds, tests, and brings its product to market. The choices are more about how a company holds onto and captures the value of what it creates than about legal paperwork. The main ones include: 

• Patent or trade secret. A patent trades public disclosure for a defined period of protection. A trade secret keeps an invention confidential but requires ongoing internal discipline to maintain. Neither is universally better. Different technologies, business models, and competitive contexts call for different choices. 

• Trademark and brand identity. A trademark protects the identity customers recognize on a product, website, or sales conversation. For startups and scaleups, thinking about brand protection early can help preserve the value they build around their technology. 

• Open source in the codebase. Open-source software is part of most modern tech stacks, and the licensing terms attached to it shape what a company can and cannot commercialize later. Founders who don’t track open-source licences during development often discover the implications when a customer, an acquirer, or an investor asks a specific question. 

• When to disclose an invention. Canada offers a 12-month grace period that allows certain public disclosures before a patent application without automatically destroying novelty. Many other jurisdictions do not. A conference demo, a customer pitch, or a product launch can affect patent rights differently depending on where a company plans to file. When to disclose is a decision founders should make deliberately, especially if international protection matters. 

• IP ownership in employment and contractor agreements. The IP created by employees, contractors, and advisors becomes a real question at every fundraising round, every acquisition conversation, and every major partnership. Getting IP assignment right in agreements up front is much easier than fixing it retroactively. 

• Freedom to operate. Protecting what a company has built is only half the picture. The other half is knowing whether that technology can be commercialized without infringing on IP rights held by someone else. A startup or scaleup can have a strong patent portfolio and still face commercial risk if it hasn’t considered what others in the space have already protected. 

• Licensing and commercialization. IP is not only a defensive tool. It can also be licensed, embedded in partnerships, or used to open new markets and revenue streams. For a startup or scaleup, planning early for how IP will be commercialized often shapes what gets protected in the first place and how. 

What Canada’s Innovation Gap Means for Startups and Scaleups 

Canada invests heavily in innovation through research funding, universities, and public infrastructure. But the country has struggled to turn that investment into commercial results at the same rate. The 2025 Global Innovation Index measures both sides. It ranks countries based on what they invest in innovation (research spending, talent, infrastructure, and business environment) and what they produce from it (patents, new businesses, technology exports, and knowledge products). Canada ranked 13th globally on what it puts in, but 20th on what it produces  (Source: WIPO Global Innovation Index 2025). A 2025 analysis by the Business Council of Alberta reached a similar conclusion: among G7 countries, Canada ranked lowest at turning its innovation investment into measurable commercial results (Source: Business Council of Alberta, November 2025). 

That gap is clear outside of Canada’s largest companies. According to Statistics Canada, roughly one in five Canadian businesses with fewer than 100 employees owns some form of IP, compared with more than seven in ten businesses with 500 or more employees (Source: IP Awareness and Use Survey, Statistics Canada). For startups and scaleups, this is where the national gap becomes personal.  

Why IP Matters for Fundraising and Investor Confidence 

Investors and lenders consider IP when evaluating a company. It is not the only factor, but it is often part of the picture. A startup with a clear IP strategy has thought about what it owns, what it can protect, and how it plans to commercialize its innovation. That thinking shows up in investor conversations, partnership discussions, and customer procurement processes, all of which eventually get to the same question: what does this company actually own? 

Canadian data reflects this. CIPO research found that companies with registered IP tend to receive financing amounts 2.4 times higher than those without. Among Canadian SMEs, the average approved amount of debt financing was $757,000 for businesses owning formal IP, compared to $245,000 for those without (Source: CIPO IP Canada Report 2024). 

That is not proof that IP alone drives better financing outcomes. Larger companies are more likely to own IP in the first place, and financing decisions depend on many factors. But the gap is real, and it tells founders something worth knowing. IP is part of what investors and lenders consider when deciding whether to back a company. Treating it as a strategic decision, rather than a legal formality to sort out later, gives a startup or scaleup a stronger position in the conversations that shape its commercial future. 

Why IP Support Can Be Difficult for Canadian Startups to Access 

For startups and scaleups, the difficulty isn’t simply knowing that IP matters. It’s knowing what to do, when to do it, and where to get the right guidance. 

The cost can be a barrier. A Statistics Canada survey found that IP protection can cost more than $10,000 per asset, including filing and professional fees. Among Canadian companies that considered but chose not to register their IP, cost was the most-cited reason, followed by uncertainty about whether the protection would be worth the investment (Source: 2019 IP Awareness and Use Survey, Statistics Canada) 

Even when cost isn’t a barrier, knowing whether to file a patent, keep something as a trade secret, or forgo protection altogether depends on business judgments most founders don’t have experience making. A 2024-25 evaluation of the National Research Council’s IP Assist program found continued demand for exactly this kind of support, with clients reporting that the program helped them work through IP decisions they would not have been able to address on their own (Source: NRC IRAP Evaluation of IP Assist, 2024-25) 

That kind of guidance is most useful before those decisions become expensive to change. 

How CENGN’s Living Lab Initiative Supports IP Strategy 

The CENGN Living Lab Initiative brings IP guidance directly into the process of testing and proving a technology.

Through partnerships with New Ventures BC and Innovate BC, every CENGN Living Lab project includes access to expert IP education and mentorship alongside the technical work. 

This means companies working on a CENGN Living Lab project can get guidance on IP decisions that arise as they build, test, and scale their product, rather than trying to sort them out after the fact. The mentorship helps founders think through what to protect, how to protect it, and how to use their IP as the company grows. 

A CENGN Living Lab project also includes real-world testing environments, technical expertise, and funding that does not require founders to give up equity in their company. With IP mentorship built into the same project, founders can work to prove their technology and protect what they build at the same time. 

A startup or scaleup that finishes a Living Lab project with both a proven technology and a clear IP strategy is in a stronger position to sell, raise funding, and grow. That is the difference between leaving a project with a product that works and leaving with a product that is ready for market. 

Turn IP Into a Competitive Advantage 

IP is one of the more important decisions a Canadian startup or scaleup can make, and one of the easier ones to put off. Founders who make those decisions early, with the right guidance, keep more control over what they have built. Founders who wait often face the same decisions later, with more pressure and fewer choices. The difference comes down to whether IP was part of the plan from the start. 

Canadian startups and scaleups don’t have to build alone. The CENGN Living Lab Initiative provides real-world testing environments, technical expertise, non-dilutive funding, and expert IP education and mentorship to help innovators validate their technology, protect what they build, and prepare for market. 

About the Author

Zeyi believes good technology deserves good communication. She enjoys turning complex ideas into clear, engaging stories that help people understand not just how technology works, but why it matters. Her writing focuses on making innovation more accessible and connecting technical ideas with the people who can put them into practice. 

As Content & Digital Media Specialist at CENGN, Zeyi creates content that communicates the impact of advanced networking technologies across Canada’s innovation ecosystem. Through articles, digital campaigns, and digital media, she shares the stories of the people, partnerships, and technologies driving commercialization and helping Canadian innovation reach the real world. 

More by Zeyi Ohikere